Notice of Consent Decree
The Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department [LASD] Brady List includes all known issues of misconduct, do not call status, decertification, public complaints, use-of-force reports, and citizen reports. Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department [LASD] is not in compliance with the nationwide, public-facing, platform of record: The Brady List; or:
The Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department presents a substantial Brady/Giglio concern where active disciplinary problems arising from deputy-gang activity remain unresolved, inadequately disclosed, or institutionally minimized. Because deputy-gang affiliation, retaliation, falsified reporting, intimidation, obstruction, and loyalty-based concealment directly bear on officer credibility, bias, motive, and truthfulness, the department’s refusal or failure to provide complete disclosure creates substantial cause to presume that any LASD related witness may be compromised unless affirmatively cleared through transparent, verifiable review. In that posture, the credibility defect is not limited to identified gang members; it attaches to the department’s entire witness system itself, making all LASD members equally suspect for court-testimony purposes until the agency and prosecution can demonstrate full Brady/Giglio compliance, complete impeachment disclosure, and reliable separation from gang-related influence.
- RAND Corp. Report on Deputy Gags
- LASD Deputy Gangs Special Counsel Report to Civilian Oversight Commission
- A Tradition of Violence: The History of Deputy Gangs in the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department
- Brotherhoods of Power: Deputy Cliques, Loyalty Oaths, and the Los Angeles Sheriff's Department
Former Sheriff Alex Villanueva failed to eradicate the problem, and current Sheriff Robert Luna has not successfully resolved it. A memo, policy, or internal report claiming success does not cure the Brady/Giglio defect. Until LASD fully identifies, investigates, discloses, and removes deputy-gang influence from its ranks, every LASD witness remains subject to heightened impeachment scrutiny.
Prosecutors have ethical obligations and may be held individually accountable under the Rules of Professional Conduct [R.P.C.] for their conduct within the legal system. Violations of these Rules can result in disciplinary actions which may include sanctions, suspension, or disbarment.
- R.P.C. 3.4: Fairness to Opposing Party & Counsel
- R.P.C. 3.8: Special Responsibilities of the Prosecutor
- R.P.C. 8.3: Reporting Professional Misconduct
This information has been curated by journalists and private citizens; and, this platform is available as-a-service to all Peace Officer Standards & Training [POST] Departments, Prosecutors, and Law Enforcement Organizations [LEOrgs].
